虽然当前呼声最高的是萨里，但米兰主帅阿莱格里也成为可能的人选。
摘要：我们只需准备好啤酒和烧烤，边看边聊，这就是足球的饕餮盛宴，胜过任何暑假大片。
他被盯死了，被控制住了，面对本届赛事最好的防线，姆巴佩无从挣脱。
1、b体育官网 我们非常高兴欢迎他加入迈阿密国际的大家庭。
谷歌在5月I/O大会上预告Gemini 3.5 Pro将在一个月左右发布，但此后因模型未达到内部性能目标而推迟上线。b体育官网现在回头看，能拥有第一天相遇时的那些照片，真的很特别。
2、超6万阿根廷球迷要求重踢世界杯决赛；“将阿根廷踢出世界杯”的请愿，已获2300万签名
对于正处于职业生涯上升期的萨利巴而言，这次手术既是无奈之举，也是彻底根治伤病的必要选择。
3、足协杯爆大冷！辽宁铁人遭中乙球队淘汰，上港、青岛西海岸晋级
这意味着米兰不会轻易放人，除非收到一份有诚意的报价。
4、广东揭阳一村民当街杀害村支书！
在马尔贝尔萨辞职后，乌拉圭足协于本周一正式宣布，任命前曼联名将迭戈·弗兰为国家队临时主教练。
5、7尺9寸巨人开球，接球手仅5尺9寸，二人同框画面太震撼
他的原话毫不含糊：“1亿欧元的报价我们没有接受，1.5亿乃至2亿的，我们同样不会接受。
研发、销售和管理等费用合计7000万，营业利润只有1000万。
曼联方面，卡里克在上赛季临危受命担任临时主帅期间表现出色，今夏正式被扶正。
6、啃阵地还是跑起来，我们眼中的二选一难题，现代篮球早已给出答案
两到三年的验证周期。
这套打法不追求控球率，而是通过三条线密集收缩压缩空间，主打防守反击。
7、津巴布韦队长赛后开喷：场地太湿没法打，我们需要一块更平的球场
而房租一天接近500元，水电约150元，三名员工的人工约380元。
朴茨茅斯出生的她让球迷们惊为天人，有人开玩笑说自己看完视频像狗一样汪汪叫，有人声称她加盟后就当樱桃军团球迷。
8、上海德比，申花“拉爆”海港
” 综合来看，赖斯虽无严重器质性损伤，但持续的神经痛感与累积疲劳仍是不可忽视的隐患。
招股书显示，2025年公司在国内脑电图机市场的占有率已超越进口品牌，排名第一。
拓竹第一次有了公开参照 拓竹计划扩产，也因为行业增长正在向低价带倾斜。
9、从濒死到复活：格拉斯哥廉价版英联邦运动会绝境求生
如果一笔交易只有10%概率出现大收益，连续十次都亏损的概率是0.9的十次方，约为34.9%。
一时间，省级母基金的门槛被踏破。
10、10球夺金靴！姆巴佩世界杯22球超越梅西，创56年纪录
决赛中，梅西和阿尔瓦雷斯全场被牢牢限制，这很大程度上要归功于这位巴萨中卫，他单场贡献了六次解围，为全场最高。
双方伤停情况：两队均无！当终场哨声在迈阿密的硬石体育场响起，记分牌上刺眼的“6-4”不仅定格了2026年世界杯季军战的比分，更将这场原本被视为“鸡肋”的安慰赛，推向了一场载入史册的进球狂欢。
1、环法总监强硬回击偏袒法国车手指控：我无权也不该知道谁被药检
跻身前五的还有2012赛季，伊布拉希莫维奇和蒂亚戈·席尔瓦的出售产生了5340万欧元的资本收益，这一年也被很多球迷定义为米兰衰落的起点。
2、中国女篮热身赛时间表：张子宇领衔，7月9日PK澳大利亚二番战
除了对阵伯明翰，巴萨在英格兰的赛程还包括8月3日与普雷斯顿的一场闭门热身赛。
3、超越梅西！姆巴佩22球独享世界杯历史射手王：比起纪录更渴望进决赛
但半导体设备是典型的成长股，不能只看当下利润。一手2014斯巴鲁翼豹WRX STi无底价出售：换装发动机、9.8万英里双方似乎都在用一种体面的方式，为这段充满遗憾的世界杯征程画上句号。
4、连续5天！即将开唱！就在邵阳这里
这粒金子般的进球不仅帮助球队晋级，更让马德里竞技为其标出的1.5亿欧元转会费显得物有所值。
5、穆杰塔巴没想到，伊朗宣布封海第二天，中国突然表态，措辞不寻常
关键胜负手 本场比赛有三方面需要重点关注的地方：一是蒙特斯停赛导致墨西哥后防核心缺席，韩国反击威胁倍增；二是韩国客场作战存在一定变数；三是韩国高位逼抢战术是主打传控的墨西哥最头疼的对手。
6、先投球的一方就能赢？百人联赛这场预测给了答案
不过，光计算的商业化绝非单颗光芯片能够完成。
颁奖台上的画面，带着几分荒诞，几分滑稽。
门店想多赚一点，就得卖毛利更高的杂牌商品。
7、随着阿根廷2-1逆转，世界杯最新排名出炉！阿根廷西班牙争冠
从23万元到1.5万亿市值，从农村修配厂到全球光模块霸主，王伟修和刘圣共同书写了一个关于眼光、胆识和信任的故事。
此前的大赛进程中，他的表现大多不温不火，但在阿根廷3比1加时击败瑞士的四分之一决赛中，26岁的他奉献了一记惊艳全场的远射世界波，一锤定音。
8、澳板球CEO：不排除在印度举行英澳对抗赛，称“必须考虑所有选项”
损失不能只用金额衡量，还要考虑杠杆、跳空、时间损耗以及无法退出的风险。
另一边，西班牙则代表着极致的控制力。
这种过山车式的表现在伯恩茅斯可以被容忍，但在利物浦？一段两个月的平局期，在伯恩茅斯是"九场不败"，到了利物浦就会变成"五场不胜"。
在公司需要上市募资扩产的情况下，这笔分红最大的疑虑还不是分红本身，而是分红用途，没错，实控人不一定是拿钱改善生活，还有一种可能。
穆里尼奥赌上未来！皇马头号巨星或被清洗！ 1.5 亿砸世界杯天王
拉珀斯维尔-约纳主场迎战韦尔：东瑞士德比揭幕瑞士挑战联赛新赛季
8外援+1归化，国安亚冠豪阵浮现 斯帕伊奇穿25号 申花浪费专属名额
加拿大仅两台！爱尔兰绿2019款高尔夫R Spektrum手动挡待售，里程8.8万公里
关联文章推荐
- 1 中国模型不再以低价换市场，而是以 Tier1 性能匹配 Tier1 定价。
- 2 英格兰作为赛前热门，整体发挥稳健，符合外界预期；而挪威队能一路黑马姿态闯入八强，靠的并非个别球星的灵光一现，而是全队上下重返精英行列的决心与韧性。
- 3 推动创新主体研发适配智能体系统调用、复杂任务调度与高频决策的通用处理器，开发低延迟、高吞吐专用推理芯片。
- 4 而最隐蔽也最致命的，是标准这道暗锁。
- 5 这样做，一方面可以帮助Anthropic加快自身的模型研发；另一方面，如果Coding的效果足够好，就能很快吸引程序员们使用。
- 6 乙游的抽卡体系和付费逻辑，都是围绕固定可攻略角色搭建的。
- 7 早在五月份欧冠决赛后，西班牙人就喊出了要"把球队带到另一个层次"的口号。
- 8 引爆点来自上海出台的直接融资“20条”，其中明确提出要推进可控核聚变、具身智能、大模型、量子计算、脑机接口等未来产业企业在科创板上市，并持续扩大第五套上市标准的适用范围。
- 9 此外，巴萨还希望引进一名正印中锋，马竞的阿根廷前锋胡利安·阿尔瓦雷斯仍是首选。
- 10 而拜仁慕尼黑则是在赛事进行期间便火速官宣，从埃因霍温签下了前锋伊斯梅尔·赛巴里。
- 11 不过加拿大的防守也存在隐患，面对强队时容易被打反击，这也是他们需要解决的问题。
- 12 面对强大的阿根廷，这三名球员只能寄望于图赫尔在战术上做出变通，或至少在替补席上给予他们证明自己的机会。
- 13 2019年出任北方华创董事长的赵晋荣，曾经讲过一句话： “北方华创最缺的不是能力，而是客户。
- 14 Nexfin News — China’s lithium battery industry is undergoing a rite of passage, transitioning from wild expansion to disciplined competition. In the first half of the year, a rare divergence between surging corporate earnings and falling stock prices brought a permanent shift in the sector’s underlying dynamics into sharp focus. By mid-July, A-share lithium battery stocks pulled back despite dramatic midyear earnings forecasts. Tianqi Lithium projected net profit growth of up to 4,935% year-over-year, EVE Energy forecast a 95% to 110% increase, and both Sunwoda and REPT BATTERO turned profitable again. Across the supply chain—from upstream lithium salts to downstream battery makers—most companies reported substantial operational gains. Yet robust earnings failed to stop equity valuations from sliding. On July 8, Chengxin Lithium hit its daily downside limit, Yahua Group dropped over 15%, and Tinci Materials saw more than 30 billion yuan in market value evaporate within a week. Ganfeng Lithium has fallen roughly 38% from its peak, while market leader CATL is down about 20%. The immediate trigger for the selloff was the resumption of operations at CATL’s Jianxiawo lithium mine. On June 29, the mine secured its safety production permit, which was officially posted on the Credit China website on July 7. The site—the world’s largest single lepidolite mine—had been idle for over ten months. With an annual capacity of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate, it previously accounted for 8% to 10% of China’s total output. Its return brings over 45,000 tons of additional supply in the second half of the year, hitting elevated lithium prices head-on. Futures markets reacted instantly: on June 18, as restart speculation grew, the main lithium carbonate contract fell 6.58% in a single session, beginning a steady slide from its May high of 205,000 yuan per ton. This stark contrast between thriving industrial output and falling stock prices coincided on the surface with lithium carbonate pulling back rapidly from its May peak of 200,000 yuan per ton to 151,000 yuan. But a more critical question remains: is this the sign of a cyclical peak, or is the industry undergoing a profound revaluation? Answering that requires stepping back to examine the paradigm shift that unfolded across the lithium battery sector between 2025 and 2026. The essence of this shift is not the fluctuation of any single price signal, but a permanent realignment of the industry's competitive playbook—moving from "who expands the fastest" to "who possesses technology, steady profits, and global compliance capabilities." From 60,000 to 200,000 In late June 2025, battery-grade lithium carbonate dropped below 60,000 yuan per ton, touching a three-year low of 59,900 yuan. Lithium salt producers across the sector incurred heavy losses, forcing widespread shutdowns among small and medium-sized manufacturers. From Australian hard-rock mines and small African projects to domestic lepidolite producers, virtually all marginal capacity went offline that summer. A two-and-a-half-year price slump accomplished its single necessary function: clearing out excess supply. By the fourth quarter of 2025, supply and demand dynamics reversed faster than the market had anticipated. The initial spark came from energy storage demand. Data from research firms including InfoLink show that global energy storage cell shipments reached roughly 610 GWh in 2025, up over 90% year-over-year, with fourth-quarter volumes alone topping 200 GWh. Production schedules showed energy storage cells clearing lithium carbonate inventories at an accelerating quarter-over-quarter pace. As growth in electric vehicle batteries moderated, energy storage stepped in not just to absorb excess capacity, but as the industry's primary growth engine. Surging demand was only half the story; supply contracted just as sharply. Small African mines and high-cost domestic lepidolite operations exited the market. Meanwhile, Zimbabwe announced a temporary suspension of lithium concentrate exports in February—a country that accounted for 15.5% of China’s lithium concentrate imports in 2025. Although Australia remained the primary pillar of China's upstream raw material supply at over 50%, the policy further tightened market expectations surrounding upstream supply. Zimbabwe's Ministry of Mines later confirmed that a formal export ban would take effect in January 2027. The tension between supply and demand peaked with the onset of a structural global deficit. Morgan Stanley estimated in early 2026 that the global market would face a shortfall of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) for the year. Soochow Securities calculated total annual lithium mine supply at approximately 2.14 million tons, representing 440,000 tons of new capacity—most of which was not slated to come online until after the third quarter. That timing gap fueled the price rally during the first half of the year. Driven by these converging forces and inventory restocking across midstream channels, lithium carbonate surged from 70,000 yuan per ton in October 2025 to 200,000 yuan by May 2026. Unlike the speculative frenzy that drove prices to 600,000 yuan in 2022, this recovery occurred after capacity had been fully built out, anchored firmly by real end-user demand. Gaogong Industry Research Institute (GGII) summarized the shift: "This is not a bubble, but a return to fundamental value. The structural surge in energy storage demand, combined with supply-side consolidation, has redefined a rational price band for lithium." Prices doubled quickly due to market sentiment and downstream stockpiling. July’s price correction reflected two main factors: the gradual release of new supply and downstream resistance to inflated raw material costs. Analysts generally expect lithium carbonate to trade within a median range of 120,000 to 160,000 yuan per ton for the full year—a price level that keeps most producers profitable without triggering another round of reckless expansion. Energy Storage as the New Engine In the first half of 2026, China's energy storage battery shipments reached roughly 485 GWh, a year-over-year increase of over 80%. Over the same period, power battery shipments totaled roughly 630 GWh, up over 30%. The gap between the two segments is narrowing rapidly. Structural figures are even more telling. In the first quarter of 2026, Chinese energy storage battery shipments totaled about 209 GWh, up 115% year-over-year and accounting for roughly 40% of total lithium battery shipments. By June, energy storage cells made up nearly 41% of monthly production schedules—up from around 30% a year earlier. According to InfoLink, full-year energy storage cell shipments in 2025 reached roughly 610 GWh, approaching 70% of power battery shipments over the same timeframe. Energy storage is no longer a side business for battery makers; it has emerged as an independent market reshaping demand across the industry. Behind this market realignment lies a fundamental shift in purchasing drivers. Before 2024, domestic energy storage growth was driven primarily by mandatory integration policies, which required wind and solar projects to install storage capacity. That regulatory setup created low-quality demand, leading to poor utilization, weak financial returns, and inconsistent cell quality. Between 2025 and 2026, market dynamics pivoted from regulatory compliance to commercial economics. The shift first materialized in the domestic market. In early 2026, the National Development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration jointly issued new capacity pricing regulations (NDRC Pricing [2026] No. 114), establishing a national capacity tariff mechanism for standalone energy storage facilities. Local standards were set between 165 and 330 yuan per kilowatt-year, depending on the province. Surveys by Soochow Securities indicated that internal rates of return (IRR) for storage stations in several provinces crossed the 6% threshold required for commercial viability, especially where peak-to-valley price spreads exceeded 0.3 yuan per kWh. IRRs for top-tier projects reached as high as 10%, fundamentally improving overall demand quality. This domestic turning point coincided with an explosion in international demand. Major solar-plus-storage projects launched across the Middle East, particularly in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, with individual project capacities regularly reaching several gigawatt-hours. In emerging markets across Australia, Southeast Asia, and Africa, weak power grids and rising renewable energy penetration transformed energy storage from an optional luxury into a necessity. Soochow Securities calculated that utility-scale storage installations in emerging markets grew 233% year-over-year in 2025, with an additional 69% increase projected for 2026. In Europe, energy security concerns and green energy quotas kept commercial, industrial, and residential demand robust. GGII projects that global energy storage battery shipments in 2026 will reach 800 to 1,100 GWh, representing year-over-year growth of 30% to 70%. Even at the mid-point estimate of 900 GWh, energy storage output is positioned to approach or match power battery production this year. As the industry's primary growth engine shifts, its core operational requirements are evolving as well. Power battery demand is dominated by automakers, whose priority is cost efficiency. The customer base for energy storage, however, is far more diverse: utility operators prioritize long cycle life and safety, data center owners require high discharge rates and extreme reliability, and overseas projects demand lifecycle compliance and supply-chain traceability. Winning in these markets requires technological adaptation, solid project execution, and international compliance capabilities rather than sheer scale. Oversupply or Industry Maturity? Evaluating battery utilization rates requires a closer look at the underlying numbers. In May 2026, the single-month installation rate for Chinese power batteries dropped to roughly 38%. Over the first five months of the year, cumulative power battery installations totaled 259 GWh against 863 GWh produced—yielding an overall utilization rate of about 30%. Factory output continues to outpace vehicle installations, leaving a substantial share of manufacturing lines underutilized. The five-year trajectory of Chinese power battery installation rates tells a clear story: 70% in 2021, 54% in 2022, roughly 52% in 2023, 50% in 2024, 44% in 2025, and 38% by May 2026. This steady decline in installation rates offers clear evidence of an industry transitioning from rapid early growth into maturity. Yet labeling the sector simply as oversupplied misses crucial nuances. The market is not experiencing a uniform glut; rather, it is undergoing sharp structural polarization. High-end shortages coexist alongside low-end surpluses. Demand for premium batteries with energy densities above 160 Wh/kg—primarily ternary chemistries—rebounded sharply, rising from a 6% market share in 2025 to 11%. Meanwhile, low-end products under 125 Wh/kg have effectively been phased out. Demand has also diverged sharply between commercial and passenger vehicles. Driven by subsidy policies, battery demand for electric heavy trucks and delivery vans surged, with battery consumption for electric cargo vans rising 169% year-over-year. By contrast, electric buses—once the industry's primary market—fell to fifth place. While market leadership remains dynamic, the nature of competitive moats is shifting. CATL and BYD together retain a 68% market share, but second-tier players like Gotion High-tech, EVE Energy, Svolt Energy, and Hithium are making gains. Competition is shifting from pure capacity expansion to technological differentiation and operating margins. From another perspective, declining installation rates are a natural hallmark of industry maturity. As annual growth moderates, a drop in capacity utilization from 70% to 40% is to be expected. While systemic capacity pressures continue to weigh on industry-wide profitability, and smaller players face ongoing price competition, market leaders retain the balance sheet strength to navigate the transition. As top-line growth slows, manufacturers lacking proprietary technology, accumulated capital, or global compliance infrastructure risk being squeezed out. This shift explains recent strategic course corrections by major capital allocators. Anode producer Sinomatech canceled a 10.3 billion yuan expansion, cathode supplier Dynanonic abandoned a 10 billion yuan project, and separator manufacturer Semcorp terminated a roughly 2 billion yuan facility in Malaysia. Top-tier players reining in massive investments is a classic sign of an industry transitioning from early expansion to financial discipline. This reallocation of capital does not mean expansion has halted entirely. In the first half of 2026, manufacturers announced over 65 new planned projects representing more than 1,500 GWh of capacity and over 220 billion yuan in total investment. Hunan Yuneng disclosed a 24 billion yuan expansion, while Yahua Group announced additional capacity in Zimbabwe. Expansion continues, but the prerequisites have changed: only enterprises with strong technical barriers, cash reserves, and global compliance infrastructure are positioned to invest while competitors scale back. Technology Race 2.0: Three Fronts If the period between 2022 and 2024 was defined by a race for manufacturing scale, 2025 and 2026 have marked a pivot toward technological differentiation across three distinct fronts. Front One: Structural Shortages in 314Ah Cells The central operational focus for the energy storage supply chain in 2026 has been a structural shortage of 314Ah cells rather than short-term price swings in raw lithium. By March, average spot prices for 314Ah cells from tier-one manufacturers approached 0.40 yuan per Wh, with small-lot orders reaching 0.45 yuan per Wh—a surge of over 25% within six months compared to the 0.30 to 0.34 yuan per Wh seen in August 2025. The immediate driver was rising raw lithium costs—at 180,000 yuan per ton of lithium carbonate, theoretical cell production costs sit between 0.35 and 0.38 yuan per Wh. However, the root cause was a supply gap during the industry's transition to larger formats. As manufacturers shift from 280Ah and 314Ah form factors toward 500Ah+ designs, investment in legacy 314Ah production lines has largely ceased. Because next-generation 500Ah+ cell capacity will not scale up until late 2026, production ramps and customer testing created a temporary bottleneck. During this supply gap, the deficit widened significantly, pushing delivery timelines for select orders into 2027. This dynamic reflects a clear shift in industry economics: market returns are no longer guaranteed simply by bringing capacity online, but by executing format transitions ahead of competitors. CATL has already deployed its 587Ah cell in a 2.4 GWh standalone storage project in Inner Mongolia, while EVE Energy has accelerated mass production of its 628Ah format. With the shift toward larger cell formats underway, manufacturing execution is everything. While 314Ah supply constraints present an immediate operational challenge, solid-state technology represents the long-term competitive battlefield. Front Two: A Return to Realism in Solid-State Batteries Although 2026 has been touted as the inaugural year for commercial solid-state battery deployment, that label requires qualification: current production consists almost entirely of semi-solid (hybrid liquid-solid) chemistries. Models including the NIO ET9, MG4, GAC Hyper, and Chery vehicles have entered the market equipped with semi-solid packs featuring energy densities between 350 and 400 Wh/kg. Because these designs remain compatible with over 90% of existing liquid battery production lines, retooling costs remain manageable and rollout schedules are accelerating. However, the commercial reality of all-solid-state technology remains far more complex than vehicle showroom specifications suggest. In March 2026, Ouyang Minggao, an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, offered a candid assessment: "To be prudent, it is best not to commercialize all-solid-state battery vehicles over the next two years." He cited three major technical hurdles: solid-solid interface stability, where microscopic gaps between solid electrolytes and electrodes cause internal resistance to spike; lithium dendrite formation and safety risks; and the environmental volatility of sulfide electrolytes, which decompose upon exposure to moisture and demand strict manufacturing conditions. Industry leaders report steady if measured progress. CATL’s sulfide-based solid-state cell has surpassed an energy density of 500 Wh/kg, with small-scale production anticipated in 2027. BYD’s 20 GWh facility in Chongqing is scheduled to begin semi-solid production in the third quarter of 2026, targeting pilot runs for all-solid-state cells in 2027. Gotion High-tech plans to initiate operations on a 2 GWh solid-state line by late 2026, while EVE Energy has produced sample 60Ah solid-state cells. A clear timeline has taken shape: 2026 is focused on pilot line verification, 2027 on vehicle testing, and 2030 on potential large-scale commercialization. The implementation of recommended national standard GB/T 43568-2026 (Solid-State Batteries for Electric Vehicles) on July 1, 2026, established an initial regulatory framework for long-term development. Ultimately, 2026 marks less the mass adoption of solid-state technology than a recalibration of market expectations. Meanwhile, an underappreciated demand driver is quietly gathering momentum. Front Three: AIDC Storage as AI Infrastructure In the first five months of 2026, global energy storage shipments for AI data centers (AIDC) reached 10 GWh, surpassing total volume for all of 2025. Industry research firms project that global AIDC storage demand will reach 300 to 400 GWh by 2030—more than twenty times its 2025 level. Capital deployment in the segment is ramping up. CATL invested roughly 4.1 billion yuan to acquire a strategic stake in Senter Power to secure positioning in high-voltage DC power distribution for data centers, while winning a bid for a 2 GW / 4 GWh storage project at a computing center in Guizhou. Fluence signed agreements covering a 12 GW pipeline of potential projects with two major U.S. cloud providers, LG secured eight data center storage contracts totaling 6 GWh—including projects for Oracle—and Panasonic announced 350 billion yen in battery investment aimed at tripling its data center storage revenue. The expansion of AIDC storage is driven by a widening gap between AI computing power demands and utility grid capacity. Power consumption per rack in modern AI facilities has jumped from 5–8 kW in traditional data centers to 40–100 kW, while grid connection approvals and capacity upgrades often take three to five years. Onsite battery systems serve both as backup power and as a bridge to accelerate facility commissioning. Energy storage is moving from an auxiliary fallback to an integrated structural component of data centers. Following NVIDIA’s October 2025 announcement of an 800V DC power architecture—designed to phase out diesel generators and legacy uninterruptible power supplies (UPS)—storage systems are being wired directly into primary distribution networks. This shift expands the market beyond traditional buyers like power utilities and renewable energy developers to encompass cloud providers and infrastructure operators, establishing a distinct category of demand. Globalization 2.0 While domestic market consolidation marks the industry’s initial transition to maturity, international expansion presents a secondary test. Tariff structures, raw material access, and regulatory standards are tightening concurrently across major export markets. Trade barriers represent the most immediate hurdle. The European Union’s countervailing duties on Chinese battery electric vehicles have been in effect for five years and are expanding to include plug-in hybrids. In the United States, the Inflation Reduction Act continues to raise domestic content requirements for power and energy storage batteries. Concurrently, China has reduced its export tax rebates for batteries from 9% to 6% as of April 2026, with complete elimination scheduled for January 2027. Rising trade costs are accelerating a shift from direct product exports to localized overseas manufacturing. At the same time, competition over raw materials is intensifying. The U.S.-led Minerals Security Partnership continues work to build key mineral supply chains outside China, while changing rules in jurisdictions like Zimbabwe highlight shifting export policies. Strategic positioning across raw material supply chains remains an ongoing operational priority. Regulatory compliance presents a quieter but more complex technical hurdle. The European Union’s Battery Passport regulations will become mandatory on February 18, 2027, requiring detailed disclosure of lifecycle carbon footprints, material origins, and recycled content percentages. The impact of these rules depends heavily on how accounting frameworks are defined; systematic discrepancies in baseline emissions databases regarding Chinese energy mixes or manufacturing processes could affect market access. In response, leading Chinese manufacturers are moving from passive compliance to active engagement with international standards. CATL has partnered with BMW and Germany’s Catena-X network to help establish over 90 baseline carbon accounting metrics. BYD invested over 100 million yuan to develop its "i-Carbon Chain" platform for digital carbon tracking across its supply chain. Similarly, REPT BATTERO collaborated with TÜV Rheinland and Circulor on a battery passport initiative, securing third-party verification for 98 independent datasets from an EU Notified Body. Overseas manufacturing footprints are expanding in tandem: CATL’s production complex in Hungary, BYD’s plant in Brazil, Gotion High-tech’s joint venture in the United States, and Envision AESC’s gigafactory in Spain. Chinese battery makers are transitioning from a model of centralized domestic production for export toward localized manufacturing aligned with international standards. This next phase of international expansion hinges on regulatory transparency, supply chain control, and deep local integration. Beyond Maturity In July 2026, as equity valuations diverged from corporate earnings across the lithium sector, market participants wrestled with where the industry stands in its broader evolution. The most visible change is the shift in growth drivers. With energy storage shipments reaching 485 GWh in the first half of the year to account for over 40% of total output, the gap between storage and mobility applications is closing rapidly. This demand-side pivot coincides with capacity rebalancing on the supply side, where power battery installation rates have adjusted from 70% down to the 30%–40% range, signaling an end to early, unbridled expansion while overall margins remain under pressure. These structural shifts are redefining entry barriers across the market. With 314Ah cell prices rising over 25% in six months and AIDC storage demand expanding rapidly, technical capabilities are increasingly determining market positioning. As national standards for solid-state technology take effect and EU Battery Passport deadlines approach, regulatory compliance has become a baseline operational requirement. The trajectory of lithium carbonate—falling to 60,000 yuan, rebounding to 200,000, and settling near 150,000—reflects a market seeking equilibrium. This broader transition was highlighted by a joint policy announcement on July 18, when three Chinese government ministries introduced a new consumption tax structure for batteries. Effective September 1, lithium-ion batteries are subject to a 2% consumption tax, rising to 4% in September 2027, while sodium-ion and solid-state batteries remain exempt through the end of 2028. The policy ends a tax exemption for lithium batteries that spanned more than a decade. Phasing in taxation uses fiscal policy to encourage capacity optimization and technological upgrading by taxing established chemistries while incentivizing next-generation alternatives. For second-tier cell makers operating on narrow margins, the 2% tax burden—equivalent to roughly 0.007 to 0.008 yuan per Wh—will further compress operating margins, reinforcing market consolidation around capitalized leaders. For China's lithium battery industry, 2026 represents a clear inflection point. Enterprises equipped with proprietary technology, international compliance frameworks, and established brand equity face a broader global landscape as the sector matures. Conversely, manufacturers reliant on single customers, lacking technical moats, or unable to meet evolving compliance standards face mounting pressure. The early expansion phase of the lithium battery industry has drawn to a close. Its mature chapter is just beginning. (This article was first published on the TMTPost App. Author | AGI-Signal, Editor | Zhao Hongyu)梅西走下世界杯赛场，变身硅谷投资人。
- 15 部分网友一针见血地指出，发起此类请愿的极大概率是C罗的极端粉丝，他们试图通过贬低对手在世界杯上的成就，来抬高自家偶像的历史地位。
- 16 俱乐部之间的谈判预计在世界杯结束后加速。
- 17 从戈登进球到阿根廷反超，英格兰的控球率只有12%，这足以说明他们招来了多大压力。
- 18 可到了用户手里，感知却是另一回事。
- 19 前几届世界杯，去现场的中国企业家翻来覆去就是那几张熟面孔。
最新评论
用户评论68886
请先登录后再发表评论
发布
相关推荐
落实落细投融资综合改革各项措施，更好发挥股票、基金、债券、期货市场功能。
道奇主帅：大谷翔平牛棚投30球是“重要迹象”，复出仍无时间表
22946
（本文首发于钛媒体APP，文 | 消费纵深，作者 | 谢璇，编辑 | 杨林）整个6到7月，《恋与深空》几乎承包了乙游圈大半争议话题。[2026]
四川省2026年普通高校对口招生/原“少数民族语言授课为主”录取控制分数线
53093
家用场景完全非结构化，物体千奇百怪，还要考虑儿童、宠物和安全责任，商业化的难度比工业场景高一个量级。
马卡报：阿莫林非常喜欢马兹拉维，他可能是AC米兰的一个引援选择
20316
不过需要注意的是，截至当前，月之暗面尚未就最新上市时间表作出公开回应，也未公开披露递表、境外上市备案等具体进展。
阿尔瓦罗踢不了，泰山队启用新星后卫，再输没借口了 克雷桑难首发
59430
同一份招股书，同一个发行价8.66元，长鑫科技有两套市盈率。
产后复出仅7个月 英格兰夺冠班底最后一人临阵伤退
48169
同赛道的直接对手也不少。
克罗斯斥阴谋论：阿根廷逆转靠实力，不是裁判！输球别再甩锅VAR
37949
刚刚年满19岁的科斯蒂奇在贝尔格莱德游击度过了首个完整的职业赛季。
“政策+数智+生态”齐发力 金塔激活青年就业创业新动能
46243
第一层为绝对核心，在这里只有拉比奥一人，俱乐部高层已将其列为非卖品，并视其为新体系的中枢基石，当然，管理层也在努力与莫德里奇完成续约。
1975年，毛主席接见各大军区同志，见到马宁：出个字谜给你猜猜？_网易订阅
75069
但马竞的态度始终坚硬如铁：不放人。
F1赞助总额预计突破30亿美元，lululemon推2026春季跑装备
83741
为什么？因为智能体（Agentic AI）的工作方式，彻底改变了算力的消耗逻辑。
MLB第一新秀竟还困在小联盟不是他不行是水手太奢侈
73192
+79005
+98339
+18764
